View My Stats

2013年2月5日 星期二

Students blow hot and cold on global warming





( The Standard P.5  5 Feb 2013) Nearly all Hong Kong students believe living a low-carbon  lifestyle (低碳生活方式) will help prevent climate change (氣候變化), but few actually do so.

A Baptist University survey (浸會大學調查報告) found 95 percent of the 6,000 students polled agree that human activities are the primary cause (主要的原因) of climate change.

But they are only willing to commit (願意付諸行動於) to walking or traveling by public transport to school, rather than change their lifestyles on clothing choices and eating habits.

"The developed and mature public transport network allows students to travel conveniently even by public transport," Kenneth Wong Koon-kwai, of the Baptist University department of geography, said.

"On the other hand, materialism (唯物主義) is still the dominant social value, and they are less willing (不太願意的) to change their clothing choices."

The survey canvassed Secondary One to Secondary Six students from 46 schools, including aided (支援), direct subsidy scheme (直接資助計劃), government and international schools.

Wong said secondary students' consciousness (意識) towards (朝向) environment protection is moderate (適度的), showing they have a positive attitude towards environment protection.

He said students believe it is difficult to change lifestyles. There is also a lack of information about the green lifestyle(實踐環保生活).

The survey shows that students believe climate change will have a significant effect (顯著的影響) on Hong Kong, such as increasing the frequency of extreme weather, a deterioration (惡化) of air quality (空氣質素), ecological destruction (生態破壞) and energy consumption (能源消費量).

Wong said those studying in international schools have relatively lower commitment (支持) to a low-carbon lifestyle (低碳生活方式), probably because they come from wealthier families.

He said the current education system does not contain sufficient (充分的) information about climate change and what is available is scattered(散佈的) in a number of subjects, or students obtain (獲得) information from the internet and the media, proving the system is inadequate (不充分的).

The government should review and update the "Guidelines on Environmental Education in Schools" that have been used for more than a decade (十年).

Kelly Ip

1 則留言:

  1. The sense of environment protection in HK is less than other countries in Asia such as Japan, Korea and Taiwan, etc.

    The complement Environmental Levy Scheme on Shopping Bags has taken effect from 7 July 2009. There are about 3,000 retailers have charged a fee of 50-cent per shopping bag if customers ask for it. Almost all consumers therefore carry their own bags with them for shopping. This policy seems to be successful. However, in my opinion, most of them do so maybe they do not want to spend any money on shopping bags. Why I think so? It is because there are many customers still waste plastic bags for buying food in markets such as fresh meat, fish, and vegetables and so on. Yet I occasionally saw a few customers to carry theirs with them for shopping there.

    I once watched the TV programme of how we do for protecting the Earth, which showed the developed and mature recycle systems in those counties are successful. People living there have to stick with their responsibilities on Environment protection.

    My friend recently came back from Taiwan and told me that she was hard to find any rubbish bins in streets there. So that she was careful and counted to use every piece of tissue paper during in her journey in Taiwan. She added it surprised her that Taiwan is a clean place even though there are not any rubbish bins on the streets. It reflects the education of the green lifestyle obtains a remarkable achievement in Taiwan.

    For Hong Kong, it still lags its neighbour countries in living a low-carbon lifestyle. As a result, the government and schools as well as parents should work together to teach our generation to build up a positive attitude toward saving the Earth. The government should also educate residents how to help prevent climate change, to promote more information and messages about the advantage of green living to the public and make them to increase the sense of saving resources in the Earth.

    Ben Chan

    回覆刪除